Decipher’s Themes for 2022

Covid lockdown over the last two years had a momentous influence on TV.  The TV industry played a significant role in making lockdown, and our emergence from it, bearable for so many people.   The impact of new tech, new players and new commercial models has been relentless through the period.  Unlike many industries, TV is generally good at riding the storm and turning the ‘new’ to its advantage.  New entrants get rapidly absorbed and become ‘old hands’ incredibly quickly, and our definition of ‘traditional TV’ expands with every new format or distribution method. We have continued to do that through the year.

2022 has continued in this vein. We think that its already possible to identify those issues that will be challenging us all, and we are putting in place workstreams to address them.  So this year we are expecting to focus our thinking into five areas and over the next few weeks we will expand on each of them. For now we thought we would share an outline of them with you for comment:

Changing of the Guard? – The last 12 months have been great for platform and device launches in the TV industry as we had a major new launches from the established players like Sky (with Sky Glass) and Virgin (with the new Virgin ‘Stream’ all-IP platform box) and Freeview Play (the AndroidTV PVR), as well as new services and devices from new players like Google, Roku and Amazon.

Recent developments have been notable for the way that the big tech companies began to use the power of their operating systems to shift from powering simple media players (like Chromecast) into other areas of TV distribution. Google had long ago expanded the remit of the Android TV OS into Smart TVs and this year took it back into set top boxes with Freeview Play and a range of platform boxes across Europe. This year we saw Smart TVs built by Amazon (using their FireOS software), in the UK for the first time (following last year’s launch in the US) and also SmartTVs from Roku (using their RokuOS9 software).
So far, the unit sales of these new OS devices aren’t significant so we don’t know their likely impact on users of traditional TV platforms or the likely impact on the current distribution share between them in the UK. This seems to us to be a fundamental question in UK television.

So, as well as assessing the potential impact of Virgin’s new platform on its market share, monitoring and assessing the shift of distribution share to a new cohort of players will be a key focus for Decipher in 2021. In particular, we will be watching how the regulators deal with the growth of TV platforms with interfaces that fall outside the ‘Prominence’ regulations, but have a growing offering of ‘live’ TV.

 

Continued Convergence – from a device perspective, the convergence of the TV industry with the phone and computing industry was a done deal a few years ago. Lockdown showed us that this convergence process is still continuing but with a new range of devices and industries. Recently, new devices like virtual assistants and audio systems, which had appeared in 2019, became mainstream in their integration with the TV industry and its device landscape. What was once a set of luxury integrations (eg ‘audio’ and ‘voice’) for high end devices ( became hygiene factor for any platform or device.
This poses two key questions for the next 12 months: firstly, how far can these existing integrations go to deliver new services and functionality. Voice control, in particular, feels like its only beginning to deliver its potential. The TV industry’s use of voice is still limited (some systems still won’t let you use voice to turn on the TV for instance). Secondly, there is a wider ‘smart home’ question of what new devices, services or industries can get pulled into TV’s orbit. New screen based innovations like Amazon’s Echo Show and Facebook’s Portal, flag up that there are still screen-based devices being invented for specific uses around our home. Services like video conferencing, utility management and CCTV are increasingly using the same devices and network connections to TV.

How these could all fit together, and whether the TV industry is a driver or passenger in the integration will become clear in 2022.

 

The Social Shift – After a few abortive attempts at building apps for the big screen, 2021 indicated that some of the social giants had begun to learn the lesson of what it took to succeed on TV. The apps of key social-video players like YouTube, Vevo and Twitch had already migrated up onto the big screen via Smart TVs and set top boxes. This year it has felt like content strategies were being developed to exploit this – with a growing focus on live events, sports and music being delivered on a big screen, but through a social app. If you are a gamer in particular, the arrival on TV of the massive live gaming events previously only popular in the Far East, meant your interests were represented properly on TV for the first time. As this happens we are seeing a shift in viewing share towards these social players, but also a change in the way we define them.

Last year we began to understand Netflix as a broadcast competitor not a platform.  In 2022 we will be watching the social video apps make the same journey and we will be monitoring the viewing going to social apps on big screen and trying to understand the implications for traditional broadcasters.  This will challenge our definition of what a ‘broadcaster’ is in 2022 – and in particular the question of how they are regulated.  The PSBs are in effect now competing head to head with Netflix, Prime, Youtube and Vevo.

In 2022 we will be trying to define what a broadcaster looks like for the ‘Twenties’ and how the market and regulators should respond.

 

‘Addressable’ To ‘Advanced’ TV Advertising –  In 2021 there was a significant focus, in advertising circles, on the growth of ‘AddressableTV’ and ‘CTV’ ad formats and buying systems. This is a natural outcome of the convergence trends discussed earlier, but Decipher like to think that this is part of a wider shift hitting TV advertising at the moment. We are now looking at the cumulative impact of a group of parallel but linked initiatives that are creating what could be described as an ‘advanced’ TV advertising culture. These initiatives include:
• The shift to addressability as data becomes further embedded in targeting and buying systems, and the potential for integrating 1st and 3rd party data more simply into delivery systems
• The acceleration of the process of automation of TV buying and the shift towards greater self-serve in these systems, prompted by the success of the systems built by the social video giants.
• The beginning of the trend for the sales of linear ads, VOD ads and ads in recorded programmes as a single TV advertising product eg Sky’s recently launched OneCampaign.
• The push to include TV measurement in new combined ‘all media’ measurement and evaluation (eg Dovetail, CFlight, Origin).

In 2022 Decipher has been reviewing the separate initiatives in these areas, but more importantly charting the cumulative impact of all the trends driving the industry towards a new ‘advanced’ state.  There is a regulatory question around these shifts as well, as we increasingly question how TV advertising on social platforms needs to meet the regulatory standards required of broadcast advertising.

 

Commercial to e-Commerce – the last 12 months have seen an explosion in the launch of ad-free content apps from major broadcast groups, along with their integration into mainstream TV platforms. The amount of ad-free TV by available volume and number of suppliers continues to grow along with un-attributable viewing hours that need to be accounted for.
The TV industry has undergone commercial ‘shocks’ before. When BT gave away the crown jewels, rewarding broadband customers with free football and movies, it turned our notion of value in the industry on its head. When Netflix showed that it was possible to build a commercially successful content business without ads it similarly changed our perception of the industry.
However, there is a third wave of change that is arriving with the integration of Amazon into parts of the platform market. As well as ad-free and subscription content, Amazon is bringing the impact of its vast e-commerce infrastructure to the table. Unlike many TV start ups, Amazon arrived in the TV market with a fully-fledged and large scale advertising capability. It started off in the market in a place of technical maturity that has taken some platforms a decade to get to. More importantly, its ability to use free TV to reward e-commerce activity through its Prime subscription base gives it the ability to monetise investments in content through a much greater variation in revenue streams than broadcast competitor.

In the next 12 months Decipher will be exploring the changing commercial base for television in the UK and examining the impact of non-TV revenues on the industry.

We look forward to debating these issues with you over the next few weeks and we would like to hear your thoughts on whether we have missed anything you think is important.

Defining ‘Addressable TV’

The ideas in this blog were first outlined in the recent Decipher White Paper ‘The Emerging Context for TV Addressability’ in 2019 and presented again at the MediaTel Future TV Advertising Conference in April 2020.

 

Television continues to change. TV and web technologies are converging and every device we use to watch TV is ‘digital’ and most likely now ‘online’ and ‘connected’.

What used to be a wholly ‘broadcast’ industry has embraced new distribution formats like on-demand and streamed content.  Now, with the advent of ‘addressable TV’, the industry is adopting the data, analysis and targeting techniques of the web.

However, this new complex television landscape is exposing gaps in the industry’s knowledge and many agencies and sales houses don’t seem to have the basic language to describe their own products and services.  Incoherent phrases like ‘TV and digital’, which should have been banished in the first wave of convergence, routinely get used by senior industy personnel, undermining any sense of authority or expertise they may claim.

The television industry and the agency world need to ensure that all players in the industry understand the basic tech behind the new technologies and have the language and terminology to join the debate about how the new landscape should evolve.

 

Nigel Walley Discussing TV Addressability in the UK for FTVA 2020

 

TV Tech Is Changing

When TV and agency people use a phrase like ‘TV and digital’ it reveals a lack of understanding of the basic building blocks of our industry.  Everyone needs to understand a TV and advertising landscape built on a core of linear TV, while recognising ‘linear’ can now be digital ‘broadcast’ as well as linear streamed IP – all of this is TV and all of it is ‘digital’.  We also need to understand the variety in on-demand functions that have developed.  TV now includes closed format ‘platform on-demand’ (as on a Sky or Virgin STB) where advertising is delivered and measured by the platform; it includes web delivered on-demand (like channel apps) where a broadcaster controls ad sales, delivery and measurement.  The nature of the data available (and therefore the nature of addressability that is possible) varies widely between these on-demand formats.  If you can’t discuss TV in this detail, then you have no place trying to sell it or plan it on behalf of clients.

Understanding the implication for how, when and where advertising can be delivered into different TV formats formats, and the differences in what can be targeted and measured in each context, is now crucial.  For agency personnel in particular, to not be able to discuss this landscape in its full nuanced detail is a failure of agency education.

Terminology Evolves

This failure is most obviously manifest in the way agencies and sales houses discuss the industry in public and with their clients.  As the TV tech landscape evolves, so the terminology we use to describe services, functionality and devices needs to evolve if we are to have a meaningful debate about their use.

An area that needs most discussion is the nature of ‘addressability’.  Too often the industry defines ‘TV’ as a vaguely untargeted and unaccountable medium, with ‘digital’ seen as being both completely addressable and accountable.  Neither stereotype has ever been true and with new ‘addressable TV’ formats, they are increasingly incoherent.  It is increasingly important to understand when TV is delivered into a shared, ‘audience’ context (ie on a telly) versus a single viewer or ‘user’ context (on a phone or tablet).  The nature of addressability is significantly different in both and they shouldn’t be treated as being the same.

The TV and web industries need to share mutually agreed definitions and terminology. But words become redundant as our understanding  is refined. ‘Digital’, online’, ‘OTT’ and even ‘broadcast’ have been through this process and need to be sidelined.  Once helpful, they are no longer sufficiently precise and now add to a fog of confusion.  Agencies and sales houses still using phrases like ‘TV and digital’ and ‘digital products’ are merely signalling their ignorance of the modern media landscape.

A New Debate Is Starting

All of this matters because the role and applicability of most new ‘addressable’ TV formats is still being debated.  Neither is it resolved which players are best positioned to deliver advertising, to capture data and insight and to formulate services in this new landscape.  A core question is whether platforms are better positioned than broadcasters to service the needs of advertisers in this landscape and what advertisers and regulators need to do to address this issue. As these products evolve, clients need all of us to be able debate the issue and advocate for outcomes which are in their interests.  Reducing the debate to ‘TV vs digital’ is to betray our professional obligations to the clients whose budgets fund our industry.

‘Addressable TV’ is now at the point where this debate can happen and the industry needs all players to  be sufficiently informed of the details and nuances to join in.  But if you and your agency are still using phrases like TV and digital, then you aren’t even in the industry, let alone the debate.

 

CES 2019 – Through the Lens of The TV Industry

This article first appeared in Broadcast Magazine on 25th Janaury 2019

Nigel Walley

Sept 2011 - New NW BW Head & Shoulders (thumbnail)Its that time of year again – CES. A hundred thousand people descend on Las Vegas to revel in new consumer technology, try and make sense of hundreds of corporate announcements and rack up our first expenses for the year. For the TV industry a show like CES is a mixed bag. Large parts of the show are irrelevant to our day to day. As well as TV, it covers health tech, car tech, drone tech, ed tech, sex tech and various other ‘tech’ areas where you might not have anticipated a tech intervention.

For the TV industry the show splits between device innovation and commercial announcements. Some companies even manage both. But before experiencing a single piece of tech you become aware of the politics of this kind of show just walking around Las Vegas looking at the billboards and the sponsorships. Apple never turn up, preferring to do their own announcements in their own venue. Even so, this year they managed to be present on various stands and even took a poster site outside the main venue with a sarcastic message targeted at other phone users. In the sections of the show dedicated to Smart Home tech, there were also multiple ‘works with Apple HomeKit’ labels attached to stands. They were on the TVs as well, in a more limited way as they announced partnerships and distribution deals with TV manufacturers.

Two years ago, with the launch of the Alexa, Amazon managed to pull the same trick – putting their devices and logos onto 500 stands without actually having their own presence. This year, Amazon took a small exhibition hall in the Venetian to explain the breadth of their tech and services offering. In response Google took over the whole town.

It felt like every major digital poster and sponsorship opportunity in Las Vegas had been taken over by Google, including the inside and outside of the monorail – even the recorded announcements on the monorail started with a ‘hey Google’ message. Outside the convention centre Google built their own pavilion with demonstration kitchens, theatres, car ports and a ‘Google Experience’ ride. Inside the convention centre they flooded the floor with Google clones dressed in Google boiler suits and woolly hats. 1800 stands had some form of Google presence on them, with 200 of them having Google manned demo rooms bolted onto the main stands. The message was that Google are coming for every part of your home.

What is clear is that the tech industry is trying to make sure our homes are ready to accept them. A consistent theme around the show this year was screens built into the most unlikely places. Before PCs and smart phones, TVs were our only screen. Now they are ubiquitous. CES showed us that any flat surface – fridges, cooker hoods, mirrors etc can be made into a screen that can run telly. Netflix on a mirror next to your bath? Amazon Prime on your shower screen? Clearly TV has a role in the smart home of the future but there isn’t much we need to do to play in this world. In Smart Homes it feels TV is a passenger on someone else’s journey.

Where we are on more familiar ground is on the TVs themselves. The mantra this year from the TV manufacturers was the same as it is every year – bigger, thinner, smarter, sharper. The signature gateway into the show is always the LG TV wall – 200 flat screen TVs linked together into an overwhelming waterfall of 8K content that you have to walk through and under to enter the show. It is a perennial demonstration of why TV always provides the figurative ‘sex’ at CES and why so many devices and innovations want our content on them.

Beyond the LG stand, most manufacturers demonstrated gorgeous 4K and 8K screens of increasing size and refinement. However, these were often coupled with utterly pointless ‘features’ to try and stand out from the crowd. We saw bendable, foldable and rollable TVs – all promoted as ‘benefits’ but really just attempts to mitigate the awkward fact that TVs are getting too big to fit into an average home. They also haven’t shed the nasty habit of including Netflix, and now Amazon Prime, buttons on their remote controls, demonstrating how the tech giants are trying to buy their way to dominance through tech deals.

A second major theme was TV software integration with the virtual assistants. Last year we were told that TVs could ‘talk to Alexa’ with a software patch. This year we were told that Alexa had been built-in to their core software. Most TVs now include a microphone and have software from Amazon, Google and in a few cases Apple, to ensure integration with the emerging voice landscape.

Clearly these deals include the requirement to have their logos on exhibition stands, not just remote controls, and many TV stands trumpeted their tech partners with stickers from each of the major ones. Samsung TVs went further than just assistant integration and included Apple AirPlay software, alongside its native casting software. As a result, Samsung were the furthest down the road to the ‘any content on any device’ vision.

A consistent theme throughout the show was the increased co-operation between the major players. Samsung demonstrated this by showing an iTunes app integration on their Smart TVs. This sat alongside the existing apps from Netflix, Amazon Prime, Hulu etc and showed that we are all on a journey towards every app on every device. The fact that Apple have felt the need to join in highlights the weakness in their TV device and service strategy to date. We were teased with an impending Apple SVOD service announcement, but the app didn’t appear at the show. We can only assume it will follow iTunes onto Samsung TVs before spreading out onto every other major brand. This will be as meaningful as Netflix arriving on Sky, but with global importance.

The TVs were interesting from a content presentation point of view. Samsung and LG are still pursuing their own operating systems and so were showing off menu designs that have borrowed heavily from the graphically rich Netflix approach. Some of the many Chinese manufacturers had bought their way into the market by adopting other software. TCS were showing their Roku TVs. However, the dominant software in TVs was Google’s android TV. This has become the default TV software for any company without its own software strategy, and gives Google an increasingly powerful gateway role for TV. Your app and content now need to be Android compatible or you aren’t in the game. It also puts TV at the heart of Google’s wider smart home strategy as all these TVs come ready to talk to Google Home and Nest.

One of those companies pursuing its own TV strategy was Amazon. With Prime now ubuiquitous on other devices, Amazon were showing off their own TV kit. Having shown they can build screen devices with their Kindle strategy they now targeting the big screen. In the US they have been trialling their own TV’s, made by companies like Toshiba, and running the FireTV software that runs in their sticks and mini-boxes. Their vision is an Amazon TV in the main room of your house and a stick plugged into every old TV in the other rooms. All plugged into Alexa and your ecommerce account.

They also demonstrated their new FireTV PVR. This is quite a shocking departure for a company that is so integral to the rise of on-demand TV. It has pioneered VOD through its own Prime service, and by hosting so many other VOD services on its own AWS platform. So to launch a broadcast recorder is really interesting statement about the TV market. It shows a pragmatic understanding that over-the-air broadcast is not going away anytime soon. It also shows an understanding of the power of local storage of recordings – particularly given the patchy quality of broadband in key markets like the US and the UK. Expect an Amazon Home Media server with integral PVR capability this year.

Stepping back from the details of the devices and the deals, the message CES gave the world is that TV is still at the heart of the tech revolution but new players are beginning to drive it. Pragmatism is breaking out between these tech players meaning content, apps and tech is increasingly shared and interoperable. The TVs that a consumer will buy in the shops will be increasingly competitive with the set top box based services from the pay platforms but are increasingly plugged into a global network of smart home, artificial intelligence and e-commerce software. For the consumer this is a fantastic outcome, but the global scale of these deals puts pressure on UK-only players.

 

This article first appeared in Broadcast Magazine on 25th Janaury 2019

Will Chromecast be significant in the UK?

This week, Decipher released the latest figures from Mediabug Wave 6, our bi-annual media consumption tracker. The findings paint a clear picture of growth in video on demand (VOD) viewing, particularly amongst older age groups, and fuelled in part by an increased accessibility to get video on demand services such as Netflix, BBC iPlayer, and Now TV to the TV screen.

The high value placed on VOD accessibility to TV screens is no state secret, however what is interesting to track is the changing ways in which viewers are choosing to do so. Whilst VOD via Pay TV set top boxes has been around for quite a number of years, it is growth in consumption through ‘Over The Top’ (OTT) devices that has caught our eye. From weighing up Mediabug data with industry news, I think a battle worth watching will be between Smart TV’s and Google Chromecast: two slightly different ways of watching video on demand on your TV. more “Will Chromecast be significant in the UK?”

The Problem With ‘Internet-First’ TV

This week we saw the second of two strategic announcements from senior execs in the state-owned television industry. Following Tony Hall’s recent announcement of an ‘internet-first’ strategy for the BBC, France Télévisions’ Director of Future Media Eric Scherer declared at a trade show this week that “the TV industry will now have to work on a ‘mobile-first’ strategy.

From ‘internet-first’ to ‘mobile-first’ in a month is breathless stuff. But we, like many in the TV industry, were left wondering what either of these things actually mean, let alone if they are a good idea? These questions have to be asked given that, after 20 years of internet and mobile disruption, around 90% of TV is still consumed via linear broadcast (with recorded broadcast content accounting for 7% or the remainder). more “The Problem With ‘Internet-First’ TV”

Google, Android TV and the Nexus Player: reasons to be excited

By Matthew Walters – @matthew_waltersmatt.walters@decipher.co.uk

Head and shouldersFresh from its initial unveiling and then its release to the US market in the Autumn, late last month Google’s latest streaming device – the Nexus Player – hit the UK shelves.  The device, retailing at £79.99 (roughly the same price as Amazon’s competitor Fire TV streaming box), is – significantly – the first to use the new Android TV operating system (OS), coming later this the smart television screens of Sony, Sharp and TP Vision.  It comes complete with the “cast” technology offered by Google’s content-less Chromecast, its Wi-Fi streaming dongle, and also offers content and services through apps from the Google Play store, among others. more “Google, Android TV and the Nexus Player: reasons to be excited”

TVOD: the crown is there for the taking

Head and shouldersIt’s been a busy few days for Google Play, Google’s digital media store.  First came the announcement last week that Google Play was to be added to the “channels” on Roku’s streaming boxes in the US, UK, Canada and Ireland.  Shortly following this was the company’s Google+ post in which it revealed that Google Play’s movie service had been rolled out to nine more countries (many in Eastern Europe, and three – Iceland, Macedonia, and Bosnia – where they’ve got in ahead of iTunes).  And now Decipher’s latest wave of Mediabug research has thrown up an interesting perspective on a service that’s not only finding its place but performing well in the UK TVOD (transactional video on demand) marketplace. more “TVOD: the crown is there for the taking”

EE TV: Replay offers glimpse of a (network) PVR future

Matt Walters – @matthew_waltersmatt.walters@decipher.co.ukHead and shoulders

Everything Everywhere, the UK’s largest mobile network with around 25m mobile customers, announced a little over three weeks ago the imminent launch of EE TV – a connected set-top box, complete with over 70 Freeview channels and a number of VOD players.  It will be free to all EE mobile customers who already are, or sign up to become, EE Broadband customers (of which there are currently just over three-quarters of a million). more “EE TV: Replay offers glimpse of a (network) PVR future”

CES – More Science Fiction than TV Strategy

PrintHaving had time to pause and reflect on my visit to CES this year I have come to the conclusion that this was one of the most divisive consumer electronics events in recent years. By divisive, I mean that it split the audience.  On the fourth night of the show, I went to drinks event full of British TV people and we stood around in a general mood of ‘hurrumph’!  We had come a long way, and put up with a lot of Las Vegas’ normal shenanigans and didn’t feel that we had got much out of it.  There was very little new about the future of TV there, beyond some silly bent TV screens, and a lot of posturing about 4K. more “CES – More Science Fiction than TV Strategy”

Decipher’s VOD Audit Q4 ’13: iTunes dominate total VOD size; but Sky lead catch-up

Decipher’s latest VOD Audit report is now available and with 84% of data collection automated, it provides the biggest and most robust picture of the UK video on demand landscape yet. It dissects the biggest 20 video on demand services in the UK giving an unrivalled overview of all VOD in the UK. 

The new expanded report reveals that Apple’s iTunes service comprehensively trounces the competition by offering a total of 65,063 video assets, 193% larger than the next largest service Xbox Video, and 275% larger than the largest TV VOD service BT TV/YouView. The biggest growth overall in VOD was seen in  Sky’s NowTV  service which is 208% larger than in September’s Q3 report. Other providers who grew strongly include Xbox Video (87%), Sky TV (+35%) and Netflix (+26%). more “Decipher’s VOD Audit Q4 ’13: iTunes dominate total VOD size; but Sky lead catch-up”